Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 34(5): 393-400, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1338763

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The COVID-19 pandemic is a global catastrophe that has led to untold suffering and death. Many previously identified policy challenges in planning for large epidemics and pandemics have been brought to the fore, and new ones have emerged. Here, we review key policy challenges and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic in order to be better prepared for the future. RECENT FINDINGS: The most important challenges facing policymakers include financing outbreak preparedness and response in a complex political environment with limited resources, coordinating response efforts among a growing and diverse range of national and international actors, accurately assessing national outbreak preparedness, addressing the shortfall in the global health workforce, building surge capacity of both human and material resources, balancing investments in public health and curative services, building capacity for outbreak-related research and development, and reinforcing measures for infection prevention and control. SUMMARY: In recent years, numerous epidemics and pandemics have caused not only considerable loss of life, but billions of dollars of economic loss. The COVID-19 pandemic served as a wake-up call and led to the implementation of relevant policies and countermeasures. Nevertheless, many questions remain and much work to be done. Wise policies and approaches for outbreak control exist but will require the political will to implement them.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Epidemics/legislation & jurisprudence , Epidemics/prevention & control , Pandemics/legislation & jurisprudence , Pandemics/prevention & control , Animals , Disease Outbreaks/legislation & jurisprudence , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Global Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Workforce/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence
2.
Eur J Health Law ; 28(2): 113-141, 2021 03 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1158160

ABSTRACT

The SARS-CoV-2 crisis of 2020 triggered a number of unprecedented reactions of European states, in particular in the form of either constitutional emergency measures or statutory anti-epidemic emergency measures. Poland chose to deal with the crisis by delegating powers to the executive by ordinary legislative means and declared a nationwide state of epidemic emergency on 13 March 2020 and a week later a state of epidemic on the basis of the Act of 5 December 2008 on preventing and combating infections and infectious diseases. For a century, Poland has been dealing with epidemics by delegating powers to the executive by ordinary legislative means. Anti-epidemic emergency measures were developed under the relevant acts of 1919, 1935, 1963, 2001, 2008 and now form an autonomous normative model authorised directly by Article 68 (4) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997. The Constitution of 2 April 1997 authorises also extraordinary measures in situations of particular danger, "if ordinary constitutional measures are inadequate". This article analyses anti-epidemic emergency regimes under Polish law in a comparative, historical and jurisprudential perspective.


Subject(s)
Emergencies , Epidemics/history , Epidemics/legislation & jurisprudence , Jurisprudence , COVID-19/epidemiology , History, 20th Century , Poland/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL